1. Steadman B, Ellsworth P. To circ or not to circ: indications, risks, and alternatives to circumcision in the pediatric population with phimosis. Urologic Nursing. 2006;26(3):181–194. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Spilsbury K, Semmens JB, Wisniewski ZS, Holman CDAJ. Circumcision for phimosis and other medical indications in Western Australian boys. Medical Journal of Australia. 2003;178(4):155–158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. Shankar KR, Rickwood AMK. The incidence of phimosis in boys. British Journal of Urology International. 1999;84(1):101–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Dewan PA. Treating phimosis. Medical Journal of Australia. 2003;178(4):148–150. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Van Howe RS. Is neonatal circumcision clinically beneficial? Argument against. Nature Clinical Practice Urology. 2009;6(2):74–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Mansfield CJ, Hueston WJ, Rudy M. Neonatal circumcision: associated factors and length of hospital stay. Journal of Family Practice. 1995;41(4):370–376. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Van Howe RS. Cost-effective treatment of phimosis. Pediatrics. 1998;102(4):p. E43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Yiee JH, Baskin LS. Penile embryology and anatomy. The Scientific World Journal. 2010;10:1174–1179. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Cold CJ, Taylor JR. The prepuce. British Journal of Urology International. 1999;83(1):34–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Sorrells ML, Snyder JL, Reiss MD, et al. Fine-touch pressure thresholds in the adult penis. British Journal of Urology International. 2007;99(4):864–869. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11. Prakash S, Raghuram R,, Venkatesan k, Ramakrishnan S. Sub-preputial wetness—its nature. Annals of National Medical Science. 1982;18(3):109–112. [Google Scholar]
12. Fleiss PM, Hodges FM, Van Howe RS. Immunological functions of the human prepuce. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 1998;74(5):364–367. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Orsola A, Caffaratti J, Garat JM. Conservative treatment of phimosis in children using a topical steroid. Urology. 2000;56(2):307–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14. Gairdner D. The fate of the foreskin, a study of circumcision. British Medical Journal. 1949;2(4642):1433–1437. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15. Kayaba H, Tamura H, Kitajima S, Fujiwara Y, Kato T, Kato T. Analysis of shape and retractability of the prepuce in 603 Japanese boys. Journal of Urology. 1996;156(5):1813–1815. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Imamura E. Phimosis of infants and young children in Japan. Acta Paediatrica Japonica. 1997;39(4):403–405. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Ishikawa E, Kawakita M. Preputial development in Japanese boys. Acta Urologica Japonica. 2004;50(5):305–308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. Øster J. Further fate of the foreskin. Incidence of preputial adhesions, phimosis, and smegm* among Danish schoolboys. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 1968;43(228):200–203. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. Rickwood AMK, Walker J. Is phimosis overdiagnosed in boys and are too many circumcisions performed in consequence? Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 1989;71(5):275–277. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20. Griffiths D, Frank JD. Inappropriate circumcision referrals by GPs. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 1992;85(6):324–325. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. Gordon A, Collin J. Save the normal foreskin. British Medical Journal. 1993;306(6869):1–2. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22. Williams N, Chell J, Kapila L. Why are children referred for circumcision? British Medical Journal. 1993;306(6869):p. 28. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23. Kumar P, Deb M, Das K. Preputial adhesions—a misunderstood entity. Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 2009;76(8):829–832. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. McGregor TB, Pike JG, Leonard MP. Phimosis—a diagnostic dilemma? The Canadian Journal of Urology. 2005;12(2):2598–2602. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25. Bromage SJ, Crump A, Pearce I. Phimosis as a presenting feature of diabetes. British Journal of Urology International. 2008;101(3):338–340. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26. Fakjian N, Hunter S, Cole GW, Miller J. An argument for circumcision. Prevention of balanitis in the adult. Archives of Dermatology. 1990;126(8):1046–1047. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27. Cates JL, Finestone A, Bogash M. Phimosis and diabetes mellitus. Journal of Urology. 1973;110(4):406–407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28. Thomas RHM, Ridley CM, Black MM. Clinical features and therapy of lichen sclerosus et atrophicus affecting males. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology. 1987;12(2):126–128. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29. McGregor TB, Pike JG, Leonard MP. Pathologic and physiologic phimosis: approach to the phimotic foreskin. Canadian Family Physician. 2007;53(3):445–448. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30. Lundquist ST, Stack LB. Diseases of the foreskin, penis, and urethra. Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America. 2001;19(3):529–546. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31. Minagawa T, Murata Y. A case of urinary retention caused by true phimosis. Acta Urologica Japonica. 2008;54(6):427–429. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32. Meuli M, Briner J, Hanimann B, Sacher P. Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus causing phimosis in boys: a prospective study with 5-year followup after complete circumcision. Journal of Urology. 1994;152(3):987–989. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33. Kikiros CS, Beasley SW, Woodward AA. The response of phimosis to local steroid application. Pediatric Surgery International. 1993;8(4):329–332. [Google Scholar]
34. Wright JE. The Treatment of childhood phimosis with topical steroid. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery. 1995;64(5):327–328. Erratum in: Aust N Z J Surg 1995;65(9):698. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35. Ghory HZ, Sharma R. Phimosis and paraphimosis. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/777539.
36. Camille CJ, Kuo RL, Wiener JS. Caring for the uncircumcised penis: what parents (and you) need to know. Contemporary Pediatrics. 2002;11:p. 61. [Google Scholar]
37. Golubovic Z, Milanovic D, Vukadinovic V, Rakic I, Perovic S. The conservative treatment of phimosis in boys. British Journal of Urology. 1996;78(5):786–788. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38. Kragballe K. Topical corticosteroids: mechanisms of action. Acta Dermato-Venereologica, Supplement. 1989;69(151):7–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39. Lehmann P, Zheng P, Lavker RM, Kligman AM. Corticosteroid atrophy in human skin. A study by light, scanning, and transmission electron microscopy. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 1983;81(2):169–176. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40. Palmer LS, Palmer JS. The efficacy of topical betamethasone for treating phimosis: a comparison of two treatment regimens. Urology. 2008;72(1):68–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41. Chu CC, Chen KEC, Diau GY. Topical steroid treatment of phimosis in boys. Journal of Urology. 1999;162(3 I):861–863. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42. Monsour MA, Rabinovitch HH, Dean GE. Medical management of phimosis in children: our experience with topical steroids. Journal of Urology. 1999;162(3):1162–1164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43. Pless TK, Spjeldnœs N, Jørgensen TM. Topical steroids in the treatment of phimosis in children. Ugeskrift for Laeger. 1999;161(47):6493–6495. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44. Ellsworth P, Berry A. Acceptance and success of topical betamethasone for phimosis as an alternative to circumcision. Abstract presented at the Northeastern and New England Sections of the American Urologic Association Joint Annual Meeting held on November 2–6, 2005.
45. Elmore JM, Baker LA, Snodgrass WT, Dewan P. Topical steroid therapy as an alternative to circumcision for phimosis in boys younger than 3 years. Journal of Urology. 2002;168(4, supplement):1746–1747. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46. Ashfield JE, Nickel KR, Siemens DR, MacNeily AE, Nickel JC. Treatment of phimosis with topical steroids in 194 children. Journal of Urology. 2003;169(3):1106–1108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
47. Dewan PA, Tieu HC, Chieng BS. Phimosis: is circumcision necessary? Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. 1996;32(4):285–289. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48. Jørgensen ET, Svensson A. The treatment of phimosis in boys, with a potent topical steroid (clobetasol propionate 0.05%) cream. Acta Dermato-Venereologica. 1993;73(1):55–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
49. Lindhagen T. Topical clobetasol propionate compared with placebo in the treatment of unretractable foreskin. European Journal of Surgery. 1996;162(12):969–972. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
50. Klyver H, Mortensen SO, Klarskov OP, Christiansen P. Treatment of phimosis with a topical steroid in boys. Ugeskrift for Laeger. 2001;163(7):922–924. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
51. Webster TM, Leonard MP. Topical steroid therapy for phimosis. The Canadian Journal of Urology. 2002;9(2):1492–1495. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
52. Khope S. Topical mometasone furoate for phimosis. Indian Pediatrics. 2010;47(3):p. 282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
53. Pileggi FDO, Vicente YAMVA. Phimotic ring topical corticoid cream (0.1% mometasone furoate) treatment in children. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2007;42(10):1749–1752. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
54. Berdeu D, Sauze L, Ha-Vinh P, Blum-Boisgard C. Cost-effectiveness analysis of treatments for phimosis: a comparison of surgical and medicinal approaches and their economic effect. British Journal of Urology International. 2001;87(3):239–244. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
55. Nobre YD, Freitas RG, Felizardo MJ, Ortiz V, Macedo A. To circ or not to circ: clinical and pharmacoeconomic outcomes of a prospective trial of topical steroid versus primary circumcision. International Brazilian Journal of Urology. 2010;36(1):75–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
56. Yilmaz E, Batislam E, Basar MM, Basar H. Psychological trauma of circumcision in the phallic period could be avoided by using topical steroids. International Journal of Urology. 2003;10(12):651–656. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
57. Fortier-Beaulieu M, Thomine E, Mitrofanof P, Laurent P, Heinet J. Lichen sclerosusetatrophicus in children. Annals of Pediatric. 1990;37:673–676. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
58. Kemal Atilla M, Dündaröz R, Odabaş O, Oztürk H, Akin R, Gökçay E. A nonsurgical approach to the treatment of phimosis: local nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory ointment application. Journal of Urology. 1997;158(1):196–197. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
59. Muller I, Muller H. New conservative therapy of phimosis. Monatsschrift fur Kinderheilkunde. 1993;141(7):607–608. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
60. Lisboa C, Ferreira A, Resende C, Rodrigues AG. Infectious balanoposthitis: management, clinical and laboratory features. International Journal of Dermatology. 2009;48(2):121–124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
61. Garcia-Bravo B, Sanchez-Pedreno P, Rodriguez-Pichardo A, Camacho F. Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus. A study of 76 cases and their relation to diabetes. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 1988;19(3):482–485. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
62. Cooper GG, Thomson GJL, Raine PAM. Therapeutic retraction of the foreskin in childhood. British Medical Journal. 1983;286(6360):186–187. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
63. Griffiths DM, Freeman NV. Non-surgical separation of preputial adhesions. The Lancet. 1984;2(8398):p. 344. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
64. MacKinlay GA. Save the prepuce. Painless separation of preputial adhesions in the outpatient clinic. British Medical Journal. 1988;297(6648):590–591. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
65. Lim A, Saw Y, Wake PN, Croton RS. Use of a eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics in the release of preputial adhesions: is it a worthwhile alternative? British Journal of Urology. 1994;73(4):428–430. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
66. He Y, Zhou XH. Balloon dilation treatment of phimosis in boys. Report of 512 cases. Chinese Medical Journal. 1991;104(6):491–493. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
67. Zampieri N, Corroppolo M, Camoglio FS, Giacomello L, Ottolenghi A. Phimosis: stretching methods with or without application of topical steroids? Journal of Pediatrics. 2005;147(5):705–706. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
68. Ghysel C, Vander Eeckt K, Bogaert GA. Long-term efficiency of skin stretching and a topical corticoid cream application for unretractable foreskin and phimosis in prepubertal boys. Urologia Internationalis. 2009;82(1):81–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
69. Parkash S. Phimosis and its plastic correction. Journal of the Indian Medical Association. 1972;58(10):389–390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
70. Kodega G, Kus G. Operative treatment of phimosis by means of spiraloplastic operation of the foreskin. Urologija i Nefrologija. 1973;38:56–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
71. Holmlund DEW. Dorsal incision of the prepuce and skin closure with dexon in patients with phimosis. Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology. 1973;7(2-3):97–99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
72. Emmett AJJ. Four V flap repair of preputial stenosis (phimosis). An alternative to circumcision. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1975;55(6):687–689. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
73. Parkash S, Raghurama Rao B. Preputial stenosis-its site and correction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1980;66(2):281–282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
74. Ohjimi T, Ohjimi H. Special surgical techniques for relief of phimosis. Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology. 1981;7(4):326–330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
75. Emmett AJJ. Z-plasty reconstruction for preputial stenosis—a surgical alternative to circulation. Australian Paediatric Journal. 1982;18(3):219–220. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
76. Codega G, Guizzardi D, Di Giuseppe P, Fassi P. The helicoidalis plasty for the treatment of phimosis. Minerva Chirurgica. 1983;38(22):1903–1907. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
77. Hoffman S, Metz P, Ebbehoj J. A new operation for phimosis: prepuce-saving technique with multiple Y-V-plasties. British Journal of Urology. 1984;56(3):319–321. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
78. Moro G, Gesmundo R, Bevilacqua A, Maiullari E, Gandini R. Circumcision with preputioplasty: notes on operative technique. Minerva Chirurgica. 1988;43:893–894. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
79. Wahlin N. ‘Triple incision plasty’. A convenient procedure for preputial relief. Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology. 1992;26(2):107–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
80. Cuckow PM, Rix G, Mouriquand PDE. Preputial plasty: a good alternative to circumcision. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 1994;29(4):561–563. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
81. De Castella H. Prepuceplasty: an alternative to circumcision. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 1994;76(4):257–258. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
82. Leal MJ, Mendes J. Ritual circumcision and the plastic repair of phimosis. Acta Medica Portuguesa. 1994;7(9):475–481. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
83. Ohjimi H, Ogata K, Ohjimi T. A new method for the relief of adult phimosis. Journal of Urology. 1995;153(5):1607–1609. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
84. Pascotto R, Giancotti E. The treatment of phimosis in childhood without circumcision: plastic repair of the prepuce. Minerva Chirurgica. 1998;53:561–565. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
85. Lane TM, South LM. Lateral preputioplasty for phimosis. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh. 1999;44(5):310–312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
86. Saxena AK, Schaarschmidt K, Reich A, Willital GH. Non-retractile foreskin: a single center 13-year experience. International Surgery. 2000;85(2):180–183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
87. Fischer-Klein C, Rauchenwald M. Triple incision to treat phimosis in children: an alternative to circumcision? British Journal of Urology International. 2003;92(4):459–462. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
88. Diaz A, Kantor HI. Dorsal slit. A circumcision alternative. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1971;37(4):619–622. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
89. Dean GE, Ritchie ML, Zaontz MR. La Vega slit procedure for the treatment of phimosis. Urology. 2000;55(3):419–421. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
90. Fraser J. The origins of circumcision. British Medical Journal. 1904;2(2295):1704–1705. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
91. Dampier-Bennett AG. The origin of circumcision. British Medical Journal. 1907;2(2430):243–244. [Google Scholar]
92. Terlecki RP, Santucci RA. Phimosis, adult circumcision and buried penis. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/442617.
93. Ginsburg CM, McCracken GH. Urinary tract infections in young infants. Pediatrics. 1982;69(4):409–412. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
94. Wiswell TE, Smith FR, Bass JW. Decreased incidence of urinary tract infections in circumcised male infants. Pediatrics. 1985;75(5):901–903. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
95. Wiswell TE. Futher evidence for the decreased incidence of urinary tract infections in circumcised male infants. Pediatrics. 1986;78(1):96–99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
96. Wiliams N, Kapila L. Complications of circumcision. British Journal of Surgery. 1993;80(10):1231–1236. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
97. Kaplan GW. Complications of circumcision. Urologic Clinics of North America. 1983;10(3):543–549. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
98. Winkelmann RK. The erogenous zones: their nerve supply and its significance. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 1959;34(2):39–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
99. Denniston GC, Hill G, Boyle GJ, Senkul T. Circumcision in adults: effect on sexual function. Urology. 2004;64(6):1267–1268. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
100. Shen Z, Chen S, Zhu C, Wan Q, Chen Z. Erectile function evaluation after adult circumcision. National Journal of Andrology. 2004;10(1):18–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
101. Masood S, Patel HRH, Himpson RC, Palmer JH, Mufti GR, Sheriff MKM. Penile sensitivity and sexual satisfaction after circumcision: are we informing men correctly? Urologia Internationalis. 2005;75(1):62–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
102. Milos M, Macris D. Circumcision: Effects Upon Human Sexuality. New York, NY, USA: Garland Pub.; 1994. (Encyclopedia of Human Sexuality). [Google Scholar]
103. Warren JP, Bigelow J. The case against circumcision. British Journal of Sexual Medicine. 1994;21(5):p. 68. [Google Scholar]
104. Zwang G. Functional and erotic consequences of sexual mutilations. In: Denniston GC, Milos MF, editors. Sexual Mutilations: A Human Tragedy New York and London. Plenum Press; 1997. [Google Scholar]
105. O’Hara K, O’Hara J. The effect of male circumcision on the sexual enjoyment of the female partner. British Journal of Urology International. 1999;83(1, supplement):79–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
